John Beck

1.2k citations
18 papers · 740 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John Beck

17 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

John Beck
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 62
  • Political Science and International Relations 391
  • Education 446
  • Sociology and Political Science 392
  • Public Administration 17
Replace Katherine Nicoll with:
Katherine Nicoll United Kingdom
Clyde Chitty United Kingdom
Ciaran Sugrue Ireland
Geoffrey Shacklock Australia
Ian Hextall United Kingdom
Walter Humes United Kingdom
Alan Barcan Australia
Tony Edwards United Kingdom
Damien Page United Kingdom
Inger Erixon Arreman Sweden
John Beck relative to Katherine Nicoll United Kingdom Katherine Nicoll's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Katherine Nicoll · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Beck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Beck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Beck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Beck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Beck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Beck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Beck. The network helps show where John Beck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside John Beck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Beck Line = papers co-authored together John Beck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2004250
2 200886
3 199982
4 200979
5 201362
6 200252
7 201538
8
Toward a Sociology of Education
197822
9 200717
10 201213
11 199912
12 20037
13 20016
14 20085
15 19815
16 19963
17 20001
18 20120

About John Beck

John Beck is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Educational Policies and Reforms (10 papers), Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies (9 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (5 papers), Religious Education and Schools (4 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (2 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (2 papers) and Critical Race Theory in Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human Factors and Ergonomics (62 citations), Political Science and International Relations (391 citations), Education (446 citations), Sociology and Political Science (392 citations) and Public Administration (17 citations). John Beck has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Michael Young, John Ahier and Morag Styles. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Journal of Education, British Journal of Sociology of Education, British Journal of Educational Studies, Sex Education and The Curriculum Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact