John Beauvais

26 papers receiving 979 citations

Peers

John Beauvais
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Applied Psychology 186
  • Family Practice 46
  • Research and Theory 19
  • General Decision Sciences 42
  • Literature and Literary Theory 89
Replace David B. Portnoy with:
David B. Portnoy United States
Renee E. Magnan United States
Andrea Levy United States
Amanda J. Dillard United States
Heather Krieger United States
Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis United States
Jennifer M. Taber United States
Britain A. Mills United States
Caitlin Gutheil United States
Michael H. Bernstein United States
John Beauvais relative to David B. Portnoy United States David B. Portnoy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
David B. Portnoy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Beauvais

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Beauvais's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Beauvais with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Beauvais more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Beauvais

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Beauvais. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Beauvais. The network helps show where John Beauvais may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Beauvais, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Beauvais Line = papers co-authored together John Beauvais links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995276
2 2000189
3 2013188
4 199558
5 200451
6 200347
7 200938
8 201924
9 200122
10 200421
11 200519
12 201919
13 199116
14 201915
15 201412
16 201911
17 20176
18 20195
19 20045
20 20193

About John Beauvais

John Beauvais is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers), Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (2 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 paper), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper) and Retinal Imaging and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (186 citations), Family Practice (46 citations), Research and Theory (19 citations), General Decision Sciences (42 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (89 citations). John Beauvais has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Salovey, Anne Moyer, Audrey Marie Beauvais, Susan DeNisco, Julie G. Stewart, Alexander J. Rothman, Marc I. Rosen, Sara Banks, Elissa S. Epel and Joyce A. Cramer. Their work appears in journals such as Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Journal of Neuroimaging, Rehabilitation Psychology and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact