John Ash

684 citations
15 papers · 518 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

John Ash

15 papers receiving 451 citations

Peers

John Ash
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Strategy and Management 160
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 123
  • Marketing 77
  • Information Systems and Management 46
  • Health Information Management 27
Replace Eliot Rich with:
Eliot Rich United States
Michael Chumer United States
Yi‐Su Chen United States
Dehai Liu China
Tengfei Yang China
Muhammad Saad Memon Pakistan
Lixin Zhou China
Rebecca Slayton United States
Mirsad Hadžikadić United States
John Ash relative to Eliot Rich United States Eliot Rich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27×
Eliot Rich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Ash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Ash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Ash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ash. The network helps show where John Ash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside John Ash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Ash Line = papers co-authored together John Ash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2007246
2 2005125
3 200536
4
Factors affecting the diffusion of the Computer-Based Patient Record.
199729
5 201021
6 201019
7 200814
8 201012
9
Factors affecting the diffusion of online end user literature searching.
19998
10 20232
11 20162
12
Community-Based Development of Standards for Geochemical and Geochronological Data
20071
13 20201
14 20111
15 19921

About John Ash

John Ash is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Marketing and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 15 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Risk Perception and Management (4 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (2 papers), Arctic and Russian Policy Studies (2 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (2 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (2 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (2 papers), Environmental Sustainability in Business (2 papers) and Nuclear and radioactivity studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (160 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (123 citations), Marketing (77 citations), Information Systems and Management (46 citations) and Health Information Management (27 citations). John Ash has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include David Newth, Risako Morimoto, Chris Hope, Clive Smallman, Joshua E. Richardson and Kerstin Lehnert. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management and Politics & Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact