John A. Elix

7.2k citations
509 papers · 5.2k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

John A. Elix

489 papers receiving 4.6k citations

Peers

John A. Elix
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 4.5k
  • Plant Science 3.8k
  • Cell Biology 1.3k
  • Toxicology 68
  • Ecological Modeling 73
Replace Chicita F. Culberson with:
Chicita F. Culberson United States
Paul I. Forster Australia
Jan A. D. Zeevaart United States
Lukáš Spíchal Czechia
Joseph Arditti United States
Åke Strid Sweden
D. S. Letham Australia
Helmut Freitag Germany
Peter M. Ray United States
F. C. Steward United States
John A. Elix relative to Chicita F. Culberson United States Chicita F. Culberson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Chicita F. Culberson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John A. Elix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John A. Elix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John A. Elix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John A. Elix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John A. Elix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John A. Elix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John A. Elix. The network helps show where John A. Elix may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John A. Elix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John A. Elix Line = papers co-authored together John A. Elix links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 509 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993218
2 1993134
3 2004125
4 198796
5 199985
6 200782
7
New chloro-depsides from the lichen Dimelaena radiata
200373
8 200567
9 197466
10
A monograph of the lichen genus Diorygma- a first attempt
200455
11
The lichen genus Herpothallon reinstated
200954
12 201453
13 201251
14 199045
15 199945
16 198842
17 201041
18 199540
19 200739
20 199538

About John A. Elix

John A. Elix is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Cell Biology, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 509 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lichen and fungal ecology (441 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (219 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (210 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (144 papers), Bryophyte Studies and Records (69 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (44 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (33 papers) and Medicinal plant effects and applications (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (4.5k citations), Plant Science (3.8k citations), Cell Biology (1.3k citations), Toxicology (68 citations) and Ecological Modeling (73 citations). John A. Elix has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include H. Thorsten Lumbsch, Judith H. Wardlaw, Ana Crespo, G. B. Feige, Gintaras Kantvilas, Arne Thell, Christina L. L. Chai, Ingvar Kärnefelt, Siegfried Huneck and Óscar Blanco. Their work appears in journals such as The Lichenologist, The Bryologist, Australian Journal of Chemistry, Tetrahedron Letters and Mycotaxon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact