Johan Wemer

34 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers

Johan Wemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Pharmacology 88
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 42
  • Immunology 62
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 54
  • Pharmacology 45
Replace S. Lindgren with:
S. Lindgren Sweden
Alex Hemeryck Belgium
Yuichi Koike Japan
Richard B.R. Muijsers Netherlands
Yoshinori Nagata Japan
Ross W. Bury Australia
J. Rosenthaler Japan
B Catanese Italy
Barbara W. LeDuc United States
Jack Botting United Kingdom
Johan Wemer relative to S. Lindgren Sweden S. Lindgren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
S. Lindgren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Wemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Wemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Wemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Wemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Wemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Wemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Wemer. The network helps show where Johan Wemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Wemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Wemer Line = papers co-authored together Johan Wemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199248
2 199838
3 200137
4 201130
5 198530
6 200328
7 201023
8 198119
9 199419
10 201217
11 199417
12 199216
13 200114
14 199114
15 198114
16 200013
17 200612
18 19959
19 19909
20 20128

About Johan Wemer

Johan Wemer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Pharmacology, Pharmacology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 34 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (6 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers), Vitamin K Research Studies (3 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (3 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (3 papers) and Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (88 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (42 citations), Immunology (62 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (54 citations) and Pharmacology (45 citations). Johan Wemer has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Guinea-Bissau. Frequent co-authors include Dick J. De Wildt, J. H. G. Jonkman, Jan van Amsterdam, Wim J. Tamminga, B. Oosterhuis, A. J. Porsius, W. Vleeming, Albert J. de Neeling, W N M Hustinx and Jaap Wieling. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact