Johan Smets

85 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Johan Smets
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 727
  • Spectroscopy 623
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
  • Organic Chemistry 883
  • Biomaterials 288
Replace Yoav Eichen with:
Yoav Eichen Israel
Epameinondas Leontidis Cyprus
Shin‐ichiro Sato Japan
Ying‐Zhong Ma United States
T. P. Radhakrishnan India
A. Subha Mahadevi India
Shin‐ichi Ishiguro Japan
Scott H. Brewer United States
Andrea Romeo Italy
Reïko Oda France
Johan Smets relative to Yoav Eichen Israel Yoav Eichen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Yoav Eichen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Smets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Smets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Smets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Smets. The network helps show where Johan Smets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Smets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Smets Line = papers co-authored together Johan Smets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994150
2 1990124
3 199392
4 199790
5 201280
6 199774
7 199672
8 201570
9 201464
10 199964
11 199464
12 201463
13 199562
14 200058
15 199156
16 201655
17 199654
18 199954
19 199753
20 199052

About Johan Smets

Johan Smets is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (26 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (20 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (19 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (13 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (12 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (12 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (10 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (727 citations), Spectroscopy (623 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations), Organic Chemistry (883 citations) and Biomaterials (288 citations). Johan Smets has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ludwik Adamowicz, Guido Maes, Dayle M. A. Smith, Steven Peter Armes, Pierre Verstraete, William J. McCarthy, Th. Zeegers‐Huyskens, Gregory E. Maes, Nicholas J. W. Penfold and Nicholas J. Warren. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact