Johan Smets

2.9k citations
85 papers · 2.6k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Smets

85 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Johan Smets
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 708
  • Spectroscopy 610
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.0k
  • Organic Chemistry 819
  • Biomaterials 276
Replace Gunnar Karlstroem with:
Gunnar Karlstroem United States
Yoav Eichen Israel
Epameinondas Leontidis Cyprus
Hans von Berlepsch Germany
Shin‐ichiro Sato Japan
A. Subha Mahadevi India
Ying‐Zhong Ma United States
T. P. Radhakrishnan India
Yanjie Zhang United States
Andrea Romeo Italy
Johan Smets relative to Gunnar Karlstroem United States Gunnar Karlstroem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Gunnar Karlstroem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Smets

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Smets's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Smets with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Smets more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Smets

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Smets. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Smets. The network helps show where Johan Smets may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Smets, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Smets Line = papers co-authored together Johan Smets links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994146
2 1990117
3 199787
4 199385
5 201276
6 199770
7 199670
8 201569
9 201463
10 199963
11 201461
12 199461
13 199557
14 201653
15 199152
16 200051
17 199751
18 199051
19 199950
20 199649

About Johan Smets

Johan Smets is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (25 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (20 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (19 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (13 papers), Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (12 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (12 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (10 papers) and Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (708 citations), Spectroscopy (610 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.0k citations), Organic Chemistry (819 citations) and Biomaterials (276 citations). Johan Smets has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ludwik Adamowicz, Guido Maes, Dayle M. A. Smith, Steven P. Armes, William J. McCarthy, Th. Zeegers‐Huyskens, Gregory E. Maes, Nicholas J. W. Penfold, Beatriu Escuder and Nicholas J. Warren. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, Chemical Physics Letters, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact