Johan Ninan

42 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Johan Ninan
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Management Science and Operations Research 254
  • Strategy and Management 165
  • Public Administration 35
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 66
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 27
Replace Francesco Di Maddaloni with:
Francesco Di Maddaloni United Kingdom
Roya Derakhshan Italy
Lauri Vuorinen Finland
Anne Live Vaagaasar Norway
Jere Lehtinen Finland
Michel Thiry
Juri Matinheikki Finland
Anna Jerbrant Sweden
Perttu Dietrich Finland
Tuomas Korhonen Finland
Johan Ninan relative to Francesco Di Maddaloni United Kingdom Francesco Di Maddaloni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Francesco Di Maddaloni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Ninan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Ninan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Ninan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Ninan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Ninan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Ninan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Ninan. The network helps show where Johan Ninan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Johan Ninan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Ninan Line = papers co-authored together Johan Ninan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201865
2 201951
3 202133
4 202027
5 202025
6 202123
7 202123
8 202219
9 202219
10 202314
11 201913
12 202213
13 202012
14 202012
15 202111
16 202210
17 20239
18 20248
19 20218
20 20236

About Johan Ninan

Johan Ninan is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management, Finance, Building and Construction and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 44 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Construction Project Management and Performance (29 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (16 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (7 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers), Public Procurement and Policy (6 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (4 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (3 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (254 citations), Strategy and Management (165 citations), Public Administration (35 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (66 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (27 citations). Johan Ninan has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stewart Clegg, Ashwin Mahalingam, Natalya Sergeeva, Shankar Sankaran, Graham Winch, Marcel Hertogh, Yongjian Ke, Lauri Vuorinen, Yan Liu and Swaminathan Natarajan. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Project Management, Construction Management and Economics, Project Management Journal, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management and International Journal of Construction Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact