Johan Braeckman

3.2k citations
92 papers · 1.8k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Johan Braeckman

88 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Johan Braeckman
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Urology 236
  • History and Philosophy of Science 129
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 499
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 277
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
Replace Peter Berger with:
Peter Berger Austria
Nicholas Agar Australia
Jon F. Merz United States
Pascal Borry Belgium
Peter Medawar United Kingdom
Julie Park United States
Kenneth W. Jones United States
Kris Dierickx Belgium
Alicia R. Martin United States
Matko Marušić Croatia
Johan Braeckman relative to Peter Berger Austria Peter Berger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32.3×
Peter Berger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Braeckman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Braeckman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Braeckman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Braeckman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Braeckman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Braeckman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Braeckman. The network helps show where Johan Braeckman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Braeckman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Braeckman Line = papers co-authored together Johan Braeckman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015135
2 2007110
3 199489
4 200779
5 200774
6 201471
7 200869
8 201160
9 201760
10 199452
11 201150
12 201049
13 200148
14 201347
15 201042
16 200741
17 199835
18 201534
19 201231
20 200930

About Johan Braeckman

Johan Braeckman is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Urology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (13 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (10 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers), Evolution and Science Education (10 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (10 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (8 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (5 papers) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (236 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (129 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (499 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (277 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 citations). Johan Braeckman has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke, D. Michielsen, Jan Verplaetse, Sven Vanneste, Marc Van Montagu, Geert De Jaeger, Frank Van Breusegem, Stijn Bruers and Hendrik Van Poppel. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Urology, The Journal of Urology, European Urology, Science & Education and Biology & Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact