Nicholas Agar

105 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Nicholas Agar
Comparison fields: 5 of 170
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 447
  • History and Philosophy of Science 85
  • Dermatology 131
  • Philosophy 150
  • Physiology 300
Replace A.J. Pakstis with:
A.J. Pakstis United States
Alicia R. Martin United States
Tom Kirkwood United Kingdom
David L. Corcoran United States
Giuseppe Testa Italy
Thomas Pradeu France
Michael E. Weale United Kingdom
Nicholas Shackel Australia
Hua Tang United States
Janice A. Egeland United States
Nicholas Agar relative to A.J. Pakstis United States A.J. Pakstis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
A.J. Pakstis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Agar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Agar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Agar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Agar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Agar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Agar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Agar. The network helps show where Nicholas Agar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nicholas Agar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nicholas Agar Line = papers co-authored together Nicholas Agar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986150
2 2004120
3
Liberal Eugenics: In Defence of Human Enhancement
2004102
4 2013101
5 199596
6 201083
7 200360
8
Red blood cells of domestic mammals
198355
9 201350
10 199547
11 197240
12 199338
13 197526
14 197225
15
Life's intrinsic value : science, ethics, and nature
200124
16 198423
17 198623
18 198921
19 201921
20 201221

About Nicholas Agar

Nicholas Agar is a scholar working on Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 116 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (30 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (20 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (18 papers), Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide (10 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (10 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (8 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (7 papers) and Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (447 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (85 citations), Dermatology (131 citations), Philosophy (150 citations) and Physiology (300 citations). Nicholas Agar has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Philip E. Hallaway, S.M. Hossein Sadrzadeh, John W. Eaton, Philip G. Board, Joseph Smith, J. D. Harley, Masatoshi Suzuki, Tsutomu Suzuki, P. K. Lauf and Norma C. Adragna. Their work appears in journals such as Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, The Medical Journal of Australia, Neurophysiologie Clinique, Bioethics and American Journal of Veterinary Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact