Johan Ahlner

173 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Peers

Johan Ahlner
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Toxicology 1.0k
  • Family Practice 141
  • Pharmacology 533
  • Pharmacology 790
  • Emergency Medicine 412
Replace Jean‐Louis Montastruc with:
Jean‐Louis Montastruc France
Olav Spigset Norway
Bernard Bégaud France
Paul Hjemdahl Sweden
SHARON L. WALSH United States
Yola Moride Canada
Steinar Hunskaar Norway
L. F. Gram Denmark
David Nicholas Bateman United Kingdom
Jordi Camı́ Spain
Johan Ahlner relative to Jean‐Louis Montastruc France Jean‐Louis Montastruc's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.5×
Jean‐Louis Montastruc · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Johan Ahlner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Johan Ahlner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan Ahlner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan Ahlner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Johan Ahlner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan Ahlner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan Ahlner. The network helps show where Johan Ahlner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Johan Ahlner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Johan Ahlner Line = papers co-authored together Johan Ahlner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 179 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991203
2 2000184
3
Fibromyalgia--are there different mechanisms in the processing of pain? A double blind crossover comparison of analgesic drugs.
1997139
4 2009124
5 2005122
6 2009113
7 1994110
8 2003109
9 1999104
10 200789
11 200188
12 199681
13 202081
14 200378
15 200977
16 200475
17 199575
18 200774
19 201071
20 200668

About Johan Ahlner

Johan Ahlner is a scholar working on Toxicology, Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 179 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (32 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (29 papers), Poisoning and overdose treatments (15 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (14 papers), Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (14 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (11 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (10 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (1.0k citations), Family Practice (141 citations), Pharmacology (533 citations), Pharmacology (790 citations) and Emergency Medicine (412 citations). Johan Ahlner has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Anita Holmgren, Per Holmgren, Fredrik C. Kugelberg, Krister L. Axelsson, Alan Wayne Jones, Henrik Druid, Anna Kristina Jönsson, Karin I. Kjellgren, Roger Säljö and Robert Kronstrand. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Science International, Journal of Analytical Toxicology, Clinical Toxicology, The American Journal of Cardiology and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact