Jodi Abbott

1.9k citations
37 papers · 737 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Jodi Abbott

34 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

Jodi Abbott
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 245
  • Health 56
  • Family Practice 12
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 48
  • Urology 35
Replace Miriam J. Haviland with:
Miriam J. Haviland United States
Lorraine Dugoff United States
Petra M. Casey United States
José Manuel Peixoto Caldas Portugal
Wendy Likes United States
Kathryn L. Reed United States
Candice Y. Johnson United States
Teresa Rodrigues Portugal
Manisha Gandhi United States
Tami S. Rowen United States
Jodi Abbott relative to Miriam J. Haviland United States Miriam J. Haviland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Miriam J. Haviland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jodi Abbott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jodi Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jodi Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jodi Abbott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jodi Abbott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jodi Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jodi Abbott. The network helps show where Jodi Abbott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jodi Abbott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jodi Abbott Line = papers co-authored together Jodi Abbott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017122
2
Chromosome studies in a neonatal population.
197292
3 201364
4 199961
5 199860
6 199452
7 200028
8 201923
9 200420
10 200219
11 201619
12 200917
13 201116
14 201816
15 202115
16 199913
17 201811
18 201510
19 199210
20 201810

About Jodi Abbott

Jodi Abbott is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, General Health Professions and Emergency Medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (5 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (245 citations), Health (56 citations), Family Practice (12 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (48 citations) and Urology (35 citations). Jodi Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Levine, Ronald J. Wapner, John L. Dalrymple, Abigail Wolf, M. Ray, J.L. Hamerton, Brittany Star Hampton, Samantha D. Buery-Joyner, Sarah M. Page-Ramsey and David A. Forstein. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, American Journal of Roentgenology and Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact