Jochen Thies

1.0k citations
49 papers · 799 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes 19
    • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes 5
    • Liver Disease and Transplantation 15

Jochen Thies

47 papers receiving 778 citations

Peers

Jochen Thies
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Hepatology 393
  • Transplantation 39
  • Surgery 482
  • Developmental Neuroscience 37
  • Biochemistry 61
Replace Kang He with:
Kang He China
K Mori Japan
Kristin M. Burkhart United States
Alberto Gómez-Alonso Spain
Lihua Wu China
Meng Guo China
James McDaid United Kingdom
Adam D. Barlow United Kingdom
Soichiro Tajima Japan
Rudolf Fischer Germany
Jochen Thies relative to Kang He China Kang He's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Kang He · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jochen Thies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jochen Thies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jochen Thies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jochen Thies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jochen Thies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jochen Thies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jochen Thies. The network helps show where Jochen Thies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jochen Thies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jochen Thies Line = papers co-authored together Jochen Thies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988177
2 199765
3 199756
4 199654
5 199853
6 200152
7 199639
8 199838
9 199933
10 199724
11 199023
12 199721
13
The influence of (+/-)-15-deoxyspergualin on experimental transplantation and its immunopharmacological mode of action.
198615
14 200813
15 198712
16
Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody prevents early rejection in liver transplantation--a pilot study.
199112
17 200111
18 200110
19 19998
20 20017

About Jochen Thies

Jochen Thies is a scholar working on Surgery, Hepatology, Molecular Biology, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 49 papers that have together received 799 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (19 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (15 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (5 papers), German History and Society (5 papers), Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (4 papers), European history and politics (4 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (4 papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (393 citations), Transplantation (39 citations), Surgery (482 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (37 citations) and Biochemistry (61 citations). Jochen Thies has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Koeppel, G. Otto, Stefan Post, Ronald G. Thurman, John J. Lemasters, Christian Herfarth, İngo Marzi, Gerhard Seitz, Gerd Otto and E. Klar. Their work appears in journals such as Transplant International, Chemosphere, Transplantation, Journal of Hepatology and Journal of Contemporary History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact