J. Motsch

203 papers receiving 5.7k citations

J. Motsch's Hit Papers

Anaesthetic efficacy and postinduction hypotension with remimazolam compared with propofol: a multicentre randomised controlled trial 2024 · 48 citations
480+1Years since publication10203040

Peers

J. Motsch
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 713
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 539
  • Emergency Medicine 755
  • Surgery 2.1k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 93
Replace Thomas Scheeren with:
Thomas Scheeren Netherlands
Pierre Asfar France
Monica Rocco Italy
Jacques Duranteau France
Vincent Minville France
B. Vallet France
B. Debaene France
Pascale Fabbro-Péray France
Jacques Créteur Belgium
Andrea Gabrielli United States
J. Motsch relative to Thomas Scheeren Netherlands Thomas Scheeren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Thomas Scheeren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Motsch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Motsch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Motsch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Motsch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Motsch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Motsch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Motsch. The network helps show where J. Motsch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Motsch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Motsch Line = papers co-authored together J. Motsch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 208 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019293
2 2002205
3 2001190
4 2001188
5 1995183
6 2003183
7 2010167
8 1999162
9 2003141
10 2001128
11 2004127
12 2001122
13 1998119
14 2001106
15 2007102
16 2002101
17 1990101
18 200594
19 199790
20 199886

About J. Motsch

J. Motsch is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 208 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (33 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (32 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (30 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (13 papers), Nausea and vomiting management (13 papers), Biomedical and Chemical Research (10 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (9 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (713 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (539 citations), Emergency Medicine (755 citations), Surgery (2.1k citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (93 citations). J. Motsch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E. Martin, Eike Martin, Thomas Grau, Bernd W. Böttiger, R. W. Leipold, R. Conradi, H. Böhrer, A. Bach, Harald Bauer and A. Gries. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Anaesthesiology, Anesthesiology, British Journal of Anaesthesia, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica and Anaesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact