Joanne Stephen
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
- Oncology 18
- Cancer survivorship and care 16
-
- Family Support in Illness 7
- Co-authors
- Michael Speca (12 shared papers)Linda E. Carlson (8 shared papers)Rie Tamagawa (7 shared papers)Richard Doll (5 shared papers)James E. Marcia (1 shared paper)Peter Faris (2 shared papers)Lihong Zhong (2 shared papers)Karen Fergus (10 shared papers)
- Journals
- Supportive Care in Cancer (4 papers)Psycho-Oncology (3 papers)Integrative Cancer Therapies (2 papers)Mindfulness (1 paper)Trials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
Joanne Stephen
37 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Applied Psychology 68
- Oncology 359
- Clinical Psychology 266
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 16
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 134
Countries citing papers authored by Joanne Stephen
This map shows the geographic impact of Joanne Stephen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanne Stephen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanne Stephen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joanne Stephen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanne Stephen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanne Stephen. The network helps show where Joanne Stephen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanne Stephen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 219 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 184 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 107 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 72 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 62 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 56 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 48 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 32 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 17 | Patient navigation in cancer care: program delivery and research in British Columbia. | 2003 | 15 |
| 18 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 12 |
About Joanne Stephen
Joanne Stephen is a scholar working on Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (16 papers), Family Support in Illness (7 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Mental Health via Writing (2 papers) and Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (68 citations), Oncology (359 citations), Clinical Psychology (266 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (16 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (134 citations). Joanne Stephen has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Michael Speca, Linda E. Carlson, Rie Tamagawa, Richard Doll, James E. Marcia, Peter Faris, Lihong Zhong, Karen Fergus, Janine Giese‐Davis and Deborah McLeod. Their work appears in journals such as Supportive Care in Cancer, Psycho-Oncology, Integrative Cancer Therapies, Mindfulness and Trials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.