Joan Liaschenko

57 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Joan Liaschenko
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Research and Theory 100
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 64
  • General Health Professions 865
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 146
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 627
Replace Ptlene Minick with:
Ptlene Minick United States
Sarah Winch Australia
Lesley Baillie United Kingdom
Linda Bell United States
Shigeko Izumi United States
Martha Raile Alligood United States
Per Nortvedt Norway
Deborah Sundin Australia
Clare Harvey Australia
Cheryle Moss Australia
Joan Liaschenko relative to Ptlene Minick United States Ptlene Minick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ptlene Minick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Liaschenko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Liaschenko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Liaschenko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Liaschenko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Liaschenko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Liaschenko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Liaschenko. The network helps show where Joan Liaschenko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Joan Liaschenko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan Liaschenko Line = papers co-authored together Joan Liaschenko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004147
2 1994110
3 200495
4 201384
5 200777
6 199972
7 201257
8 202054
9 199744
10 201644
11 200941
12 199340
13 201636
14 200134
15 199531
16 201130
17 201630
18 201529
19 200728
20 201525

About Joan Liaschenko

Joan Liaschenko is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (29 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (15 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (13 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (9 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (100 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (64 citations), General Health Professions (865 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (146 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (627 citations). Joan Liaschenko has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Peter, Cynthia Peden‐McAlpine, Jane Stein‐Parbury, Anastasia A. Fisher, Mary Faith Marshall, Debra DeBruin, Sandra Millon Underwood, Mary Regan, Jan Angus and Susan O’Conner-Von. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Ethics, Nursing Ethics, Advances in Nursing Science, Journal of Palliative Care and Nursing Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact