Joan Liaschenko

63 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Joan Liaschenko
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Research and Theory 84
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 55
  • General Health Professions 796
  • Emergency Medical Services 124
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 90
Replace Megan‐Jane Johnstone with:
Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia
Linda Bell United States
Barbara Pesut Canada
Lesley Baillie United Kingdom
Kerry Reid‐Searl Australia
Sarah Winch Australia
Marjorie A. Schaffer United States
Per Nortvedt Norway
Rosanna F. DeMarco United States
Janet Storch Canada
Joan Liaschenko relative to Megan‐Jane Johnstone Australia Megan‐Jane Johnstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Megan‐Jane Johnstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan Liaschenko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan Liaschenko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan Liaschenko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan Liaschenko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan Liaschenko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan Liaschenko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan Liaschenko. The network helps show where Joan Liaschenko may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Joan Liaschenko, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan Liaschenko Line = papers co-authored together Joan Liaschenko links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004153
2 1994117
3 2004100
4 201389
5 200781
6 199975
7 202064
8 201263
9 201655
10 199747
11 201644
12 199343
13 200941
14 199534
15 200134
16 201132
17 201631
18 201530
19 200728
20 199927

About Joan Liaschenko

Joan Liaschenko is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (32 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (16 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (14 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (8 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (4 papers), Disaster Response and Management (3 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (3 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (84 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (55 citations), General Health Professions (796 citations), Emergency Medical Services (124 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (90 citations). Joan Liaschenko has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth Peter, Cynthia Peden‐McAlpine, Jane Stein‐Parbury, Anastasia A. Fisher, Mary Faith Marshall, Debra DeBruin, Mary Regan, Sandra Millon Underwood, Jan Angus and Susan O’Conner-Von. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Ethics, Nursing Ethics, Advances in Nursing Science, Nursing Philosophy and Journal of Palliative Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact