Jan Angus

58 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Jan Angus
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Research and Theory 44
  • General Health Professions 588
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 27
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 317
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 22
Replace DeAnne K. Hilfinger Messias with:
DeAnne K. Hilfinger Messias United States
Jennifer Baumbusch Canada
Susan Salmond United States
Anne McMurray Australia
Kerstin Segesten Sweden
Malcolm Boyle Australia
Sonja McIlfatrick United Kingdom
Abbas Abbaszadeh Iran
Abbas Heydari Iran
Kerry Kuluski Canada
Jan Angus relative to DeAnne K. Hilfinger Messias United States DeAnne K. Hilfinger Messias's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
DeAnne K. Hilfinger Messias · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Angus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Angus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Angus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Angus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Angus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Angus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Angus. The network helps show where Jan Angus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Angus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Angus Line = papers co-authored together Jan Angus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004204
2 1999203
3 2005160
4 2013103
5 201297
6 201393
7 201386
8 200362
9 195659
10 200449
11 201041
12 200339
13 201139
14 201134
15 200632
16 201231
17 200330
18 201230
19 201530
20 201230

About Jan Angus

Jan Angus is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacy, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Health and Mental Health (8 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (3 papers), Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (3 papers) and Nosocomial Infections in ICU (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (44 citations), General Health Professions (588 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (27 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (317 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (22 citations). Jan Angus has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Patricia McKeever, Pia Kontos, Isabel Dyck, Elizabeth Peter, Alexander M. Clark, James A. Stone, Kathryn King‐Shier, Melisa A. Spaling, Amanda S. Duncan and Susan Jaglal. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Health Research, Social Science & Medicine, Nursing Inquiry, Health & Social Care in the Community and Disability & Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact