Joan E. King

28 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers

Joan E. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Applied Psychology 70
  • General Decision Sciences 10
  • General Health Professions 105
  • Family Practice 8
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 18
Replace Lauren Connell Bohlen with:
Lauren Connell Bohlen United States
Dennis Gingrich United States
Esther Granado‐Font Spain
Leslie Gelling United Kingdom
Amanda C. Blok United States
Katherine J. Roberts United States
Gail A. Hilbert United States
Chi‐Wen Kao Taiwan
Gloria R. Webb Australia
S Ginpil Australia
Joan E. King relative to Lauren Connell Bohlen United States Lauren Connell Bohlen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Lauren Connell Bohlen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joan E. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joan E. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joan E. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joan E. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joan E. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joan E. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joan E. King. The network helps show where Joan E. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Joan E. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joan E. King Line = papers co-authored together Joan E. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199061
2 198460
3 199334
4 198329
5 199124
6 198617
7 201817
8 200616
9 199312
10 198711
11 201810
12 20126
13 20115
14 20074
15
Removing the walls and expanding the boundaries. A curriculum model for acute care nurse practitioners.
19974
16 20083
17 20042
18 20052
19 20082
20 20172

About Joan E. King

Joan E. King is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases (2 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (2 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (2 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (70 citations), General Decision Sciences (10 citations), General Health Professions (105 citations), Family Practice (8 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (18 citations). Joan E. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth A. Wallston, Dawn K. Wilson, Roberta A. Smith, Barbara Strudler Wallston, Michael May, Brian Jefferson, Vivian Tong Nagy, Sarah Davis, Ida M. Martinson and Janice Lander. Their work appears in journals such as AACN Advanced Critical Care, Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, Journal of Nursing Education, Nursing and Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact