Joakim Wright

1.1k citations
20 papers · 381 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Joakim Wright

19 papers receiving 362 citations

Peers

Joakim Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
  • Software 109
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 264
  • Artificial Intelligence 292
  • Hardware and Architecture 57
  • Theoretical Computer Science 3
Replace Eduardo Giménez with:
Eduardo Giménez
Christopher P. Wadsworth United Kingdom
Judicaël Courant France
Andrew Ireland United Kingdom
C. R. Murthy United States
N. P. Mendler United Kingdom
Bruno Barras France
Willem-Paul de Roever Germany
Douglas J. Howe United States
Stuart F. Allen United States
Joakim Wright relative to Eduardo Giménez Eduardo Giménez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Eduardo Giménez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joakim Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joakim Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joakim Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joakim Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joakim Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joakim Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joakim Wright. The network helps show where Joakim Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Joakim Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joakim Wright Line = papers co-authored together Joakim Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 1998146
2 199035
3 200434
4 199027
5 199925
6 199221
7 199714
8 200314
9 200012
10 19939
11 19948
12 20008
13 19937
14 20095
15 19915
16 20044
17 20003
18 19962
19 20002
20 20050

About Joakim Wright

Joakim Wright is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Software, Computer Networks and Communications and Hardware and Architecture, having authored 20 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (16 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (11 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers), Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques (3 papers), Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (2 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (109 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (264 citations), Artificial Intelligence (292 citations), Hardware and Architecture (57 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (3 citations). Joakim Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ralph‐Johan Back, R. J. R. Back, Jim Grundy, Orieta Celiku and Kaisa Sere. Their work appears in journals such as Formal Aspects of Computing, Science of Computer Programming, Acta Informatica, Theoretical Computer Science and Formal Methods in System Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact