Formal Methods in System Design

667 papers and 8.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 667 papers published in Formal Methods in System Design in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Formal Methods in System Design usually cover Computational Theory and Mathematics (555 papers), Artificial Intelligence (319 papers) and Software (250 papers) specifically the topics of Formal Methods in Verification (537 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (221 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (173 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Formal Methods in System Design are Antti Valmari, Moshe Y. Vardi, Edmund M. Clarke, Patrice Godefroid, Werner Damm, Orna Kupferman, David Harel, Rajeev Alur, Thomas A. Henzinger and David L. Dill.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Formal Methods in System Design

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Formal Methods in System Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Formal Methods in System Design.

Countries where authors publish in Formal Methods in System Design

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Formal Methods in System Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Formal Methods in System Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Formal Methods in System Design more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025