Joachim E. Roehr

15 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Joachim E. Roehr
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 138
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 74
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 95
  • Biological Psychiatry 9
  • Pharmacology 56
Replace Liliane Unger with:
Liliane Unger Germany
Rodolfo Testa Italy
Michio Terai Japan
Joseph Géczy Belgium
Szabolcs Orosz Hungary
F. Le Coz France
Muhammad Sajjad Shahid Pakistan
Joël Vian France
R. Kyle Palmer United States
N. Corsico Italy
Joachim E. Roehr relative to Liliane Unger Germany Liliane Unger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Liliane Unger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joachim E. Roehr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim E. Roehr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim E. Roehr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim E. Roehr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim E. Roehr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim E. Roehr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim E. Roehr. The network helps show where Joachim E. Roehr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joachim E. Roehr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joachim E. Roehr Line = papers co-authored together Joachim E. Roehr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2002189
2 199669
3 199735
4 199629
5 199429
6 199616
7 199413
8 199712
9 199611
10 19959
11 19979
12 20124
13 19883
14 19963
15 19941

About Joachim E. Roehr

Joachim E. Roehr is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 15 papers that have together received 432 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (3 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers), Synthesis and biological activity (2 papers), Synthesis and Reactivity of Heterocycles (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (138 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (74 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (95 citations), Biological Psychiatry (9 citations) and Pharmacology (56 citations). Joachim E. Roehr has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Sathapana Kongsamut, Jiesheng Kang, Xiaoliang Chen, David Rampe, Harold B. Hartman, Lisa L. Kerman, Lei‐Han Tang, Anthony Sandrasagra, Roy Corbett and Craig P. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Neurochemical Research and CNS Drug Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact