Jo Parsons
Impact in
-
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
-
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Papers in
-
- COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction 4
-
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 2
- Co-authors
- Helen Atherton (11 shared papers)Carol Bryce (4 shared papers)Katie Newby (5 shared papers)Sarah Griffiths (2 shared papers)Katherine Brown (2 shared papers)Emily Fulton (2 shared papers)Felix Naughton (1 shared paper)Ildikó Tombor (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of General Practice (5 papers)Digital Health (3 papers)BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (2 papers)BMJ Open (2 papers)Health Psychology Review (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Jo Parsons
30 papers receiving 324 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Applied Psychology 29
- Health 37
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 27
- Conservation 11
- Emergency Medical Services 16
Countries citing papers authored by Jo Parsons
This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Parsons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Parsons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Parsons more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Parsons
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Parsons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Parsons. The network helps show where Jo Parsons may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Parsons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 63 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 3 |
About Jo Parsons
Jo Parsons is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology and Applied Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (2 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers), Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers) and Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (29 citations), Health (37 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (27 citations), Conservation (11 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (16 citations). Jo Parsons has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Helen Atherton, Carol Bryce, Katie Newby, Sarah Griffiths, Katherine Brown, Emily Fulton, Felix Naughton, Ildikó Tombor, Jeremy Dale and David French. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, Digital Health, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, BMJ Open and Health Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.