Jo Middlemass

16 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers

Jo Middlemass
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 200
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 57
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 158
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Replace Michelle Tubman with:
Michelle Tubman Canada
Jaime M. Hughes United States
Susan L. Dunn United States
Anders Broström Sweden
Erika Bassi Italy
Peter Maramaldi United States
Maria Raisa Jessica Aquino United Kingdom
Yan‐Min Xu China
J. Pokorski Poland
Bo‐Huei Huang Australia
Jo Middlemass relative to Michelle Tubman Canada Michelle Tubman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Michelle Tubman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Middlemass

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Middlemass's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Middlemass with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Middlemass more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Middlemass

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Middlemass. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Middlemass. The network helps show where Jo Middlemass may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Middlemass, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Middlemass Line = papers co-authored together Jo Middlemass links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2012193
2 2018104
3 201748
4 201347
5 201839
6 201223
7 200618
8 201415
9 200911
10 20039
11
Confidentiality in the waiting room: an observational study in general practice.
20079
12 20088
13 20141
14 20151
15 20161
16
Challenges for carers of people with dementia and their support needs from health and social care providers: a qualitative study
20161

About Jo Middlemass

Jo Middlemass is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (3 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (2 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (2 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (2 papers) and Sleep and Wakefulness Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (200 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (57 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (158 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Jo Middlemass has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Italy. Frequent co-authors include A Niroshan Siriwardena, Irving Kirsch, Markos Klonizakis, Tania B. Huedo–Medina, Zowie Davy, Terence Karran, Raffaele L. Dellacá, Christer Janson, Ramón Farré and Ruth Sepper. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of General Practice, BMC Health Services Research, Health Expectations, Medical Education and Dementia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact