Jo McBride

26 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Jo McBride
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Public Administration 137
  • General Health Professions 159
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 36
  • Political Science and International Relations 67
  • Sociology and Political Science 100
Replace Shane Doheny with:
Shane Doheny United Kingdom
Polly Toynbee United Kingdom
Dieter Sauer Germany
Yukiko Abe Japan
Knut Halvorsen Norway
Joanna Howard United Kingdom
Cynthia Griggs Fleming United States
Pauli Kettunen Finland
Ulla Pape Germany
Héloïse Petit France
Jo McBride relative to Shane Doheny United Kingdom Shane Doheny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Shane Doheny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo McBride

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo McBride's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo McBride with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo McBride more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo McBride

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo McBride. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo McBride. The network helps show where Jo McBride may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jo McBride, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo McBride Line = papers co-authored together Jo McBride links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Community unionism : a comparative analysis of concepts and contexts
200929
2 202228
3 202028
4 202027
5 201121
6 201821
7 200819
8 200418
9 201714
10 201312
11 200912
12 201812
13 202211
14 200611
15 20209
16 20219
17 20029
18 20128
19 20167
20 20117

About Jo McBride

Jo McBride is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 26 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (19 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (16 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (3 papers) and Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (137 citations), General Health Professions (159 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (36 citations), Political Science and International Relations (67 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (100 citations). Jo McBride has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Bulgaria. Frequent co-authors include Andrew James Smith, Miguel Martínez Lucio, John Stirling, Paul Stewart, Amanda Tattersall, Jane Holgate, Carol A. Stephenson and Steve Craig. Their work appears in journals such as Work Employment and Society, Capital & Class, Economic and Industrial Democracy, New Technology Work and Employment and British Journal of Industrial Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact