J.M. Pope

5.4k citations
121 papers · 4.2k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

J.M. Pope

119 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers

J.M. Pope
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.4k
  • Ophthalmology 390
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 468
  • Radiation 263
  • Epidemiology 882
Replace Joel R. Garbow with:
Joel R. Garbow United States
Stefan Andersson‐Engels Sweden
Hiroaki Takahashi Japan
Peter P. Antich United States
Yufeng Zhou China
Terence A. King United Kingdom
Irving J. Bigio United States
Hiroshi Matsumura Japan
Chaohui Ye China
Roland Hergenröder Germany
J.M. Pope relative to Joel R. Garbow United States Joel R. Garbow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15.6×
Joel R. Garbow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.M. Pope

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.M. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.M. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.M. Pope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.M. Pope

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.M. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.M. Pope. The network helps show where J.M. Pope may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.M. Pope, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.M. Pope Line = papers co-authored together J.M. Pope links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 121 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004327
2 2000202
3 2008192
4 2005172
5 1997133
6 2008115
7 1998108
8 2011106
9 199399
10 201291
11 199991
12 199790
13 198482
14 197282
15 200781
16 200177
17 200675
18 201769
19 198866
20 199365

About J.M. Pope

J.M. Pope is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 121 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (32 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (31 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (17 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (13 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (12 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (9 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.4k citations), Ophthalmology (390 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (468 citations), Radiation (263 citations) and Epidemiology (882 citations). J.M. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David A. Atchison, Catherine E. Jones, Patrick McConville, Shenggen Yao, Sanjeev Kasthurirangan, Emma L. Markwell, Roger Meder, Paul S. Tofts, Tomas Kron and Katrina L. Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Physics in Medicine and Biology, Chemistry and Physics of Lipids and Biomedical Optics Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact