J.‐M. Billard

666 citations
13 papers · 598 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

J.‐M. Billard

13 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

J.‐M. Billard
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Biological Psychiatry 85
  • Biochemistry 221
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 353
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 58
  • Developmental Neuroscience 53
Replace Keiko Ikemoto with:
Keiko Ikemoto Japan
P. Liu New Zealand
Joseph M. Masserano United States
Manuel Esguerra United States
Steve J. Mick United States
Anita Kulak Switzerland
Julie A. Cler United States
Rosa Fradley United Kingdom
RUSSELL W. LAKE United States
Federica Marmo Italy
J.‐M. Billard relative to Keiko Ikemoto Japan Keiko Ikemoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Keiko Ikemoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.‐M. Billard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.‐M. Billard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.‐M. Billard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.‐M. Billard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.‐M. Billard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.‐M. Billard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.‐M. Billard. The network helps show where J.‐M. Billard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside J.‐M. Billard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.‐M. Billard Line = papers co-authored together J.‐M. Billard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2006140
2 200676
3 200669
4 200846
5 199843
6 198340
7 199536
8 200834
9 199629
10 201328
11 199624
12 199422
13 199111

About J.‐M. Billard

J.‐M. Billard is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Biochemistry and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 13 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (4 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (2 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (85 citations), Biochemistry (221 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (353 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (58 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (53 citations). J.‐M. Billard has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and Tunisia. Frequent co-authors include P. Dutar, Anne Jouvenceau, Jacques Epelbaum, Jean‐Pierre Mothet, Y. Lamour, Brigitte Potier, Pierre‐Marie Sinet, Catherine Videau, Fabrice Turpin and Willy Mayo. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Neuroscience, Neuroreport, Journal of Neurophysiology, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Neurobiology of Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact