J.J. Mateos

30 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers

J.J. Mateos
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 204
  • Biological Psychiatry 34
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 140
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 115
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 78
Replace Fangfang Tian with:
Fangfang Tian China
Fukiat Ongseng United States
Koichi Hagiwara Japan
Pernille Iversen Denmark
Fabrizio Mancini Italy
Carlos Benito Spain
Lei Gao China
A. Catafau Spain
Leszek Sagan Poland
Martha Spilioti Greece
J.J. Mateos relative to Fangfang Tian China Fangfang Tian's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.7×
Fangfang Tian · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J.J. Mateos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J.J. Mateos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J.J. Mateos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J.J. Mateos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J.J. Mateos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J.J. Mateos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J.J. Mateos. The network helps show where J.J. Mateos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside J.J. Mateos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J.J. Mateos Line = papers co-authored together J.J. Mateos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200989
2 200263
3 200656
4 200250
5 200044
6 200639
7 200135
8 200534
9 200131
10 200430
11 200128
12
Successful treatment of rhinocerebral zygomycosis with a combination of caspofungin and liposomal amphotericin B.
200528
13 200423
14 200215
15 201111
16 200011
17 200610
18 200210
19 200010
20 19999

About J.J. Mateos

J.J. Mateos is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Psychiatry and Mental health, Infectious Diseases and Oncology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 658 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers), Urologic and reproductive health conditions (2 papers), Infectious Disease Case Reports and Treatments (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (204 citations), Biological Psychiatry (34 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (140 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (115 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (78 citations). J.J. Mateos has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francisco Lomeña, Cristòbal Gastó, Miquel Bernardo, Eduard Parellada, Alberto Prats‐Galino, F. Lomeña, Javier Pavı́a, Marı́a J. Portella, Emilio Fernández-Egea and David Fuster. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Medicine Communications, NeuroImage, Transplant International, Psychopharmacology and Schizophrenia Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact