David Fuster

5.7k citations
127 papers · 2.2k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

David Fuster

122 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

David Fuster
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Nephrology 537
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 438
  • Surgery 557
  • Oncology 325
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 330
Replace Pietro Zucchetta with:
Pietro Zucchetta Italy
Chun K. Kim United States
Anish Bhattacharya India
E. Sarfati France
Isabel Millán Spain
S Karstrup Denmark
Antonia E. Stephen United States
Eren Berber United States
Carmen Gómez‐Vaquero Spain
Ute Eisenberger Germany
David Fuster relative to Pietro Zucchetta Italy Pietro Zucchetta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Pietro Zucchetta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Fuster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Fuster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Fuster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Fuster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Fuster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Fuster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Fuster. The network helps show where David Fuster may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Fuster, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Fuster Line = papers co-authored together David Fuster links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 127 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008209
2 2009197
3
Is 18F-FDG PET more accurate than standard diagnostic procedures in the detection of suspected recurrent melanoma?
200497
4 201696
5 200987
6 200378
7 200864
8 199760
9 201455
10 200151
11 201249
12 201047
13 199738
14 202037
15 200135
16 200533
17 201332
18 200331
19 200030
20 201029

About David Fuster

David Fuster is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Nephrology, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 127 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (23 papers), Medical Imaging and Pathology Studies (16 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (9 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (7 papers), Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management (7 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (6 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (537 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (438 citations), Surgery (557 citations), Oncology (325 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (330 citations). David Fuster has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Françesca Pons, José‐Vicente Torregrosa, Pilar Paredes, Joan Duch, Montserrat Muñoz-Mateu, Domenico Rubello, M. Fontanillas, Sergi Vidal‐Sicart, F Pons and Martín Velasco. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Medicine Communications, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Transplant International, PLoS ONE and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact