Jinjun Li

1.1k citations
67 papers · 781 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

    • Gut microbiota and health 14
    • Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors 5
    • Diet and metabolism studies 12

Jinjun Li

60 papers receiving 772 citations

Peers

Jinjun Li
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Animal Science and Zoology 187
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 119
  • Biochemistry 38
  • Food Science 86
  • Physiology 124
Replace Tomislav Mašek with:
Tomislav Mašek Croatia
Yueyue Liu China
Ziwei Xu China
Dingyuan Feng China
Holger Kluge Germany
Wei Nie China
Zongyong Jiang China
Kwang‐Youn Whang South Korea
Yordan Martínez Cuba
Jinjun Li relative to Tomislav Mašek Croatia Tomislav Mašek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Tomislav Mašek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jinjun Li

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jinjun Li's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jinjun Li with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jinjun Li more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jinjun Li

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jinjun Li. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jinjun Li. The network helps show where Jinjun Li may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jinjun Li, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jinjun Li Line = papers co-authored together Jinjun Li links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014108
2 201594
3 202276
4 201338
5 202233
6 202232
7 201525
8 202224
9 201122
10 201119
11 201216
12 202216
13 201115
14 201414
15 202214
16 201713
17 201913
18 202412
19 202211
20 202311

About Jinjun Li

Jinjun Li is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Food Science and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 781 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gut microbiota and health (14 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (12 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (8 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (8 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (6 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (6 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (5 papers) and Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (187 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (119 citations), Biochemistry (38 citations), Food Science (86 citations) and Physiology (124 citations). Jinjun Li has collaborated with scholars based in China, India and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Lizhi Lu, Deqian Wang, Guoqin Li, Tao Zeng, Genlin Wang, Yong Tian, Zhengrong Tao, Junda Shen, Liying Zhu and Hualing Xie. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Animal Science, Frontiers in Nutrition, Molecular Biology Reports, Food Chemistry X and International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact