Jing Jin

2.2k citations
81 papers · 1.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

    • Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 7
    • Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 6
    • Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food 3

Jing Jin

77 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jing Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 189
  • Pharmacology 117
  • Cancer Research 159
  • Molecular Biology 690
  • Biochemistry 56
Replace Shi Qiu with:
Shi Qiu China
Shengjie Yang China
Khaled Hossain Bangladesh
Yuanyuan Xie China
Yonggang Ma China
Yanhua Xie China
Peili Zhu Hong Kong
Xuan Liu China
Wan‐Yang Sun China
Eun Mi Choi South Korea
Jing Jin relative to Shi Qiu China Shi Qiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Shi Qiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jing Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jing Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jing Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jing Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jing Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jing Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jing Jin. The network helps show where Jing Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jing Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jing Jin Line = papers co-authored together Jing Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 81 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016139
2 201097
3 201493
4 200671
5 201562
6 201555
7 202055
8 201951
9 201851
10 200649
11 200942
12 201839
13 202038
14 202035
15 202134
16 202234
17 201533
18 201832
19 201132
20 202227

About Jing Jin

Jing Jin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Oncology, Cancer Research and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 81 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (7 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (6 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (5 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Face and Expression Recognition (3 papers), Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment (3 papers) and Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (189 citations), Pharmacology (117 citations), Cancer Research (159 citations), Molecular Biology (690 citations) and Biochemistry (56 citations). Jing Jin has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Min Huang, Xupeng Bai, Xiang‐Yu Hou, Zhongxiang Zhao, Yibei Chen, Tiangang Luan, Di Cao, Zhiying Huang, Chuncao Xu and Shiqin Jiang. Their work appears in journals such as Fitoterapia, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Phytomedicine, Phytotherapy Research and Planta Medica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact