Jim Specht

79 papers receiving 905 citations

Peers

Jim Specht
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Geography, Planning and Development 936
  • Paleontology 640
  • Anthropology 447
  • Archeology 13
  • Archeology 126
Replace Christophe Sand with:
Christophe Sand New Caledonia
Christian Reepmeyer Australia
Richard Shutler United States
Peter Sheppard New Zealand
W. R. Ambrose Australia
Ethan E. Cochrane United States
Eusebio Dizon Philippines
Glenn R. Summerhayes New Zealand
Matthew Leavesley Australia
Thomas S. Dye United States
Jim Specht relative to Christophe Sand New Caledonia Christophe Sand's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Christophe Sand · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jim Specht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jim Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jim Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jim Specht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jim Specht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jim Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jim Specht. The network helps show where Jim Specht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jim Specht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jim Specht Line = papers co-authored together Jim Specht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201281
2 198970
3 199864
4 199260
5
Dating Lapita Pottery in the Bismarck Archipelago, Papua New Guinea
199757
6 199648
7 198848
8 200939
9 198339
10 198137
11 201336
12 199130
13 200729
14 198828
15 201028
16
The prehistoric archaeology of Norfolk Island
198424
17 198523
18 197720
19
West New Britain Obsidian: production and consumption patterns
199318
20 201317

About Jim Specht

Jim Specht is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Anthropology, Paleontology, Archeology and Atmospheric Science, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (59 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (25 papers), Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (24 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (13 papers), Maritime and Coastal Archaeology (12 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (6 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (5 papers) and Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (936 citations), Paleontology (640 citations), Anthropology (447 citations), Archeology (13 citations) and Archeology (126 citations). Jim Specht has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robin Torrence, Chris Gosden, Richard Fullagar, Tim Denham, Ian Lilley, Glenn R. Summerhayes, Christopher Bronk Ramsey, Carol Lentfer, Patrick Vinton Kirch and Matthew Spriggs. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Archaeology, Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania, Records of the Australian Museum, Asian perspectives and Antiquity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact