Asian perspectives

440 papers and 5.1k indexed citations

About

The 440 papers published in Asian perspectives in the last decades have received a total of 5.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian perspectives usually cover Geography, Planning and Development (229 papers), Paleontology (184 papers) and Anthropology (165 papers) specifically the topics of Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (229 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (178 papers) and Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian perspectives are Melinda S. Allen, Nicolas Rolland, Sue O’Connor, Lisa Kealhofer, Huw Barton, Atholl Anderson, Matthew Spriggs, Geoffrey Clark, Dougald O’Reilly and Liu Li.

In The Last Decade

Asian perspectives

379 papers receiving 4.3k citations

Fields of papers published in Asian perspectives

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian perspectives. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian perspectives.

Countries where authors publish in Asian perspectives

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian perspectives. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian perspectives with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian perspectives more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026