Records of the Australian Museum

787 papers and 8.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 787 papers published in Records of the Australian Museum in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Records of the Australian Museum usually cover Ecology (325 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (240 papers) and Oceanography (235 papers) specifically the topics of Marine Biology and Ecology Research (230 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (113 papers) and Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (79 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Records of the Australian Museum are Niel L. Bruce, E. F. Riek, Allen E. Greer, M. S. Moulds, Pat Hutchings, David K. McAlpine, Hannelore Paxton, J. K. LOWRY, Alan A. Myers and Mary E. White.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Records of the Australian Museum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Records of the Australian Museum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Records of the Australian Museum.

Countries where authors publish in Records of the Australian Museum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Records of the Australian Museum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Records of the Australian Museum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Records of the Australian Museum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025