Jill Shaw

11 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Jill Shaw
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 128
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 16
  • Biological Psychiatry 10
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 73
  • Physiology 86
Replace Chi Kin Ip with:
Chi Kin Ip Australia
Lourdes Valencia-Torres United Kingdom
Roberta Mazza Italy
Esther M. van der Zwaal Netherlands
Saori Miyagishi Japan
Molly McDougle United States
Nilla Orthen-Gambill United States
Megan Greenwald-Yarnell United States
Oliver Marston United Kingdom
Nachiket A. Nadkarni France
Jill Shaw relative to Chi Kin Ip Australia Chi Kin Ip's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
Chi Kin Ip · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jill Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jill Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jill Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jill Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jill Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jill Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jill Shaw. The network helps show where Jill Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jill Shaw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jill Shaw Line = papers co-authored together Jill Shaw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2010219
2 201154
3 201426
4 201120
5 201018
6 197517
7 201011
8 20235
9 20142
10
What's in it for me? The stick and the carrot as tools for developing academic communities
20091
11
fOUndIt? Sharing online resources to support subject communities
20091

About Jill Shaw

Jill Shaw is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Surgery, Nutrition and Dietetics, Communication and Molecular Biology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (6 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (3 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper) and Second Language Learning and Teaching (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (128 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (16 citations), Biological Psychiatry (10 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (73 citations) and Physiology (86 citations). Jill Shaw has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Taiwan and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include Lora K. Heisler, Alastair S. Garfield, Daniel D. Lam, Oliver Marston, Mark L. Evans, Mayowa A. Osundiji, Chen-Yu Yueh, W. R. Buckett, Carolina Colliva and Luke K. Burke. Their work appears in journals such as Behavioural Brain Research, Endocrinology, Metabolism, Psychopharmacology and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact