Jia-Ching Wu

34 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Jia-Ching Wu
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Biochemistry 298
  • Molecular Medicine 187
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 75
  • Pharmacology 94
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 165
Replace Hongwei Si with:
Hongwei Si United States
Rozita Naseri Iran
Yoo‐Hyun Lee South Korea
Peihong Fan China
Woojin Jun South Korea
Ana Belén Granado‐Serrano Spain
Santa Cirmi Italy
Benny Kwong Huat Tan Singapore
N. Nalini India
María Ángeles Ávila‐Gálvez Spain
Jia-Ching Wu relative to Hongwei Si United States Hongwei Si's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Hongwei Si · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jia-Ching Wu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jia-Ching Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jia-Ching Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jia-Ching Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jia-Ching Wu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jia-Ching Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jia-Ching Wu. The network helps show where Jia-Ching Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jia-Ching Wu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jia-Ching Wu Line = papers co-authored together Jia-Ching Wu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015157
2 2010151
3 2013104
4 2011102
5 201189
6 201886
7 201383
8 201373
9 201165
10 201864
11 201961
12 201553
13 201652
14 201650
15 201547
16 201743
17 201840
18 201437
19 201729
20 201925

About Jia-Ching Wu

Jia-Ching Wu is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Molecular Medicine, Physiology and Plant Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (8 papers), Curcumin's Biomedical Applications (6 papers), Genomics, phytochemicals, and oxidative stress (4 papers), Bioactive Compounds in Plants (4 papers), Flavonoids in Medical Research (3 papers), Tannin, Tannase and Anticancer Activities (3 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (3 papers) and Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (298 citations), Molecular Medicine (187 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (75 citations), Pharmacology (94 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (165 citations). Jia-Ching Wu has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Min‐Hsiung Pan, Chi‐Tang Ho, Ching‐Shu Lai, Vladimir Badmaev, Ying‐Jan Wang, Monthana Weerawatanakorn, Kalyanam Nagabhushanam, Shiming Li, Mei-Ling Tsai and Mei‐Ling Tsai. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Current Opinion in Food Science, Journal of Food and Drug Analysis and BioFactors.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact