Jia Ning

27 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Jia Ning
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Pharmacology 66
  • Cancer Research 37
  • Molecular Biology 175
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 43
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 16
Replace Kyle R. Roell with:
Kyle R. Roell United States
Junko Yamamoto Japan
Christine C. Orozco United States
Mohammad Reza Abedini Iran
Ved Prakash Pathak United States
Emna Kerkeni Tunisia
Midori Ono Japan
Graham Prestwich United Kingdom
Andrew Povey United Kingdom
Krishna Prakash Gupta India
Jia Ning relative to Kyle R. Roell United States Kyle R. Roell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×11×
Kyle R. Roell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jia Ning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jia Ning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jia Ning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jia Ning more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jia Ning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jia Ning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jia Ning. The network helps show where Jia Ning may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jia Ning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jia Ning Line = papers co-authored together Jia Ning links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202150
2 201938
3 201837
4 202036
5 201334
6 201433
7 202227
8 201725
9 202023
10 202216
11 201716
12 201515
13 201815
14 201913
15 201912
16 201912
17 201811
18 201511
19 201011
20 20179

About Jia Ning

Jia Ning is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cancer Research, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Toxicity and Pharmacological Properties (5 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (4 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers), Pregnancy and Medication Impact (3 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (2 papers), Fungal Plant Pathogen Control (2 papers) and Signaling Pathways in Disease (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (66 citations), Cancer Research (37 citations), Molecular Biology (175 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (43 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (16 citations). Jia Ning has collaborated with scholars based in China, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ivonne M.C.M. Rietjens, Amita Pansari, Masoud Jamei, Khaled Abduljalil, Sebastiaan Wesseling, Jochem Louisse, Weiping Zhu, Tony Hunter, Kévin Adam and Lin Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Toxicology, Food and Chemical Toxicology, CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, The Australian Educational Researcher and Plant Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact