Ji Lin

2.3k citations
148 papers · 1.9k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Ji Lin

135 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Ji Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.7k
  • Modeling and Simulation 277
  • Geometry and Topology 417
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 715
  • Mathematical Physics 201
Replace Robert Conte with:
Robert Conte France
C. R. Gilson United Kingdom
F. Pempinelli Italy
M. Boiti Italy
P.G. Estévez Spain
Mikhail A. Salle Russia
J. J. C. Nimmo United Kingdom
Chaohao Gu China
Kimiaki Konno Japan
Micheline Musette Belgium
Ji Lin relative to Robert Conte France Robert Conte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
Robert Conte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ji Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ji Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ji Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ji Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ji Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ji Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ji Lin. The network helps show where Ji Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ji Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ji Lin Line = papers co-authored together Ji Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 148 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016110
2 200091
3 202082
4 202068
5 202065
6 201957
7 200847
8 201844
9 201942
10 200140
11 202438
12 200136
13 201235
14 201032
15 200130
16 200330
17 200229
18 200629
19 201628
20 202127

About Ji Lin

Ji Lin is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Geometry and Topology, Spectroscopy and Mathematical Physics, having authored 148 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonlinear Photonic Systems (114 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (111 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (44 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (24 papers), Strong Light-Matter Interactions (12 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (12 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (11 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.7k citations), Modeling and Simulation (277 citations), Geometry and Topology (417 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (715 citations) and Mathematical Physics (201 citations). Ji Lin has collaborated with scholars based in China, Italy and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Bo Ren, Sen‐Yue Lou, Xiaoyan Tang, Huamei Li, Xue-Ping Cheng, Man Jia, Faisal Javed, Lou Sen‐Yue, Yishen Li and Jian Jia. Their work appears in journals such as Nonlinear Dynamics, Chinese Physics Letters, Physics Letters A, Physical review. B. and Communications in Theoretical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact