Jessica Fields

1.2k citations
35 papers · 769 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jessica Fields

32 papers receiving 726 citations

Peers

Jessica Fields
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Gender Studies 219
  • Reproductive Medicine 104
  • Social Psychology 221
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 65
  • General Health Professions 143
Replace Lisa R. Rubin with:
Lisa R. Rubin United States
Margaret Robinson Canada
Emilee Gilbert Australia
Alexandra Hawkey Australia
Brandon L. Crawford United States
İsmet Koç Türkiye
Nelson F. Sánchez United States
Judith L. M. McCoyd United States
Anne Woollett United Kingdom
Alfonso Osorio Spain
Jessica Fields relative to Lisa R. Rubin United States Lisa R. Rubin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Lisa R. Rubin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jessica Fields

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jessica Fields's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jessica Fields with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jessica Fields more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jessica Fields

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jessica Fields. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jessica Fields. The network helps show where Jessica Fields may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jessica Fields, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jessica Fields Line = papers co-authored together Jessica Fields links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008141
2 2001100
3 202091
4 202090
5 201157
6 201854
7 201831
8 200727
9 201426
10 201719
11 201217
12 201813
13 202212
14 201912
15 201612
16 200411
17 20179
18 20128
19 20237
20 20244

About Jessica Fields

Jessica Fields is a scholar working on Social Psychology, General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gender Studies and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 35 papers that have together received 769 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (10 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (6 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (6 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (4 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers) and Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (219 citations), Reproductive Medicine (104 citations), Social Psychology (221 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (65 citations) and General Health Professions (143 citations). Jessica Fields has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Luseadra McKerracher, Sarah Williams, Robert‐Paul Juster, L. Zachary DuBois, Melissa K. Frey, Jeffrey I. Mechanick, Edward S. Horton, Eloise Chapman‐Davis, Kevin Holcomb and Jen Gilbert. Their work appears in journals such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Journal of Human Biology, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Sexuality Research and Social Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact