Debra D’Angelo

2.3k citations
32 papers · 1.3k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Debra D’Angelo

29 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Debra D’Angelo
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 704
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 248
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 353
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 127
  • Genetics 229
Replace Clement Vachet with:
Clement Vachet United States
Nan-Tsing Chiu Taiwan
John Romano United States
Lianne M. Reus Netherlands
Tuong‐Vi Nguyen Canada
Julio Sanjuán Spain
Matthias Beckmann Germany
P. Bourgouin Canada
Budhachandra Khundrakpam Canada
Lara G. Chepenik United States
Debra D’Angelo relative to Clement Vachet United States Clement Vachet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Clement Vachet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Debra D’Angelo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra D’Angelo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra D’Angelo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra D’Angelo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra D’Angelo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra D’Angelo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra D’Angelo. The network helps show where Debra D’Angelo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Debra D’Angelo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Debra D’Angelo Line = papers co-authored together Debra D’Angelo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009405
2 2016135
3 2012126
4 2009124
5 201175
6 201060
7 201854
8 202053
9 201648
10 200543
11 201727
12 201918
13 201415
14 201814
15 202311
16 201910
17 201710
18 20238
19 20198
20 20126

About Debra D’Angelo

Debra D’Angelo is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Surgery, Physiology and Genetics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Congenital heart defects research (4 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (4 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (3 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (3 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (704 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (248 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (353 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (127 citations) and Genetics (229 citations). Debra D’Angelo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Matthew J. Hoptman, Daniel C. Javitt, Michael P. Milham, Cristina J. Mauro, Pamela D. Butler, Xi‐Nian Zuo, Qixuan Chen, Karen A. Nolan, Wendy K. Chung and Elliott H. Sherr. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, JAMA Network Open, Academic Radiology and Journal of Surgical Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact