Jerome Friedman

473 citations
25 papers · 145 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 5
    • Sephardic Jews and Inquisition Studies 3
    • Historical and Linguistic Studies 6
    • Race, History, and American Society 1

Jerome Friedman

21 papers receiving 76 citations

Peers

Jerome Friedman
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • History 63
  • Religious studies 23
  • Classics 16
  • Philosophy 35
  • Literature and Literary Theory 28
Replace Bob Scribner with:
Bob Scribner United Kingdom
Cedric C. Brown United Kingdom
Geoffrey Rowell United Kingdom
Sharon Achinstein United States
Nicholas von Maltzahn Canada
Henry Charles Lea
N. H. Keeble United Kingdom
Janel Mueller United States
Katharina M. Wilson
Rudolph P. Almasy United States
Jerome Friedman relative to Bob Scribner United Kingdom Bob Scribner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Bob Scribner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jerome Friedman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jerome Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jerome Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jerome Friedman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jerome Friedman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jerome Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jerome Friedman. The network helps show where Jerome Friedman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Jerome Friedman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jerome Friedman Line = papers co-authored together Jerome Friedman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198724
2 198321
3 199313
4 198412
5 199112
6 199010
7 19958
8 19888
9
Miracles and the pulp press during the English Revolution : the battle of the frogs and Fairford's flies
19937
10 19915
11 19884
12 19793
13 19933
14 19873
15 19902
16 19832
17 19992
18 19921
19 19801
20 19741

About Jerome Friedman

Jerome Friedman is a scholar working on History, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Religious studies and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 25 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Linguistic Studies (6 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (5 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (5 papers), Sephardic Jews and Inquisition Studies (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers), Philippine History and Culture (1 paper), Race, History, and American Society (1 paper) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (63 citations), Religious studies (23 citations), Classics (16 citations), Philosophy (35 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (28 citations). Jerome Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard L. Greaves, J. C. Davis and Charles Carlton. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Physics Today and Church History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact