John N. King
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- William H. ReMine (1 shared paper)James T. Priestley (1 shared paper)Edward S. Judd (1 shared paper)Jean Calvin (1 shared paper)Clifford Davidson (1 shared paper)John J. Foxe (1 shared paper)Ludwig Wittgenstein (1 shared paper)John Bale (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Sixteenth Century Journal (3 papers)Renaissance Quarterly (3 papers)Huntington Library Quarterly (2 papers)Canadian Journal of Forest Research (2 papers)Modern Philology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
John N. King
38 papers receiving 295 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Classics 115
- History 240
- Religious studies 52
- Museology 33
- Literature and Literary Theory 94
Countries citing papers authored by John N. King
This map shows the geographic impact of John N. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John N. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John N. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John N. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John N. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John N. King. The network helps show where John N. King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside John N. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1970 | 99 | |
| 2 | 1990 | 40 | |
| 3 | Commentaries on the First Book of Moses, Called Genesis | 2009 | 36 |
| 4 | 1990 | 34 | |
| 5 | 1976 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 26 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 26 | |
| 9 | Tudor books and readers : materiality and the construction of meaning | 2010 | 25 |
| 10 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 11 | 1987 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1965 | 11 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 10 | |
| 15 | 1976 | 9 | |
| 16 | 1991 | 9 | |
| 17 | Henry VIII and his afterlives : literature, politics, and art | 2012 | 7 |
| 18 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 6 | |
| 20 | Wittgenstein's Lectures: Cambridge: 1930-1932, From the Notes of John King and Desmond Lee | 1980 | 6 |
About John N. King
John N. King is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Political Science and International Relations and Philosophy, having authored 49 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (15 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (7 papers), Medieval Literature and History (6 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (6 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (4 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (2 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (115 citations), History (240 citations), Religious studies (52 citations), Museology (33 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (94 citations). John N. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William H. ReMine, James T. Priestley, Edward S. Judd, Jean Calvin, Clifford Davidson, John J. Foxe, Ludwig Wittgenstein, John Bale, Sally N. Aitken and Mats Hannerz. Their work appears in journals such as Sixteenth Century Journal, Renaissance Quarterly, Huntington Library Quarterly, Canadian Journal of Forest Research and Modern Philology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.