Jeffrey DeVido

703 citations
12 papers · 523 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jeffrey DeVido

12 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers

Jeffrey DeVido
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 289
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 248
  • Clinical Psychology 116
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 69
  • Applied Psychology 18
Replace Tasha Kalista with:
Tasha Kalista United States
Lijuan Huo China
Geoffry McEnany United States
Yee Ming Mok Singapore
Sizhen Su China
Wendy Wickes Australia
JAMES A. BRAITH United States
Andrea Cuamatzi-Castelan United States
Eesha Sharma India
Nina Timmerby Denmark
Jeffrey DeVido relative to Tasha Kalista United States Tasha Kalista's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tasha Kalista · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeffrey DeVido

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeffrey DeVido's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeffrey DeVido with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeffrey DeVido more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeffrey DeVido

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeffrey DeVido. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeffrey DeVido. The network helps show where Jeffrey DeVido may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jeffrey DeVido, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeffrey DeVido Line = papers co-authored together Jeffrey DeVido links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2012139
2 2008132
3 201054
4 201550
5 201245
6 201537
7 201526
8 200821
9 201511
10 20144
11 20143
12 20201

About Jeffrey DeVido

Jeffrey DeVido is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions, having authored 12 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (1 paper) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (289 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (248 citations), Clinical Psychology (116 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (69 citations) and Applied Psychology (18 citations). Jeffrey DeVido has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roger D. Weiss, James Blair, Daniel S. Pine, Karina S. Blair, Marilla Geraci, Nick G. Hollon, Marcela C. Otero, Olivera Bogunovic, Bruce W. Smith and Daniel McCaffrey. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal on Addictions, Biological Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health and Harvard Review of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact