Jay T. Johnson

2.6k citations
39 papers · 1.8k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jay T. Johnson

37 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Jay T. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Geography, Planning and Development 390
  • Health 414
  • General Health Professions 494
  • Anthropology 213
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 194
Replace Paul Nadasdy with:
Paul Nadasdy United States
Sandie Suchet‐Pearson Australia
Deborah McGregor Canada
Zoe Todd Canada
Jon Altman Australia
Marcia Langton Australia
Paul J. Sillitoe United Kingdom
Mario Blaser Canada
Daniel R. Wildcat United States
David S Trigger Australia
Jay T. Johnson relative to Paul Nadasdy United States Paul Nadasdy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
Paul Nadasdy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay T. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay T. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay T. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay T. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay T. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay T. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay T. Johnson. The network helps show where Jay T. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay T. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay T. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Jay T. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015300
2 2015208
3 2011122
4 2014113
5 2007101
6 201089
7 201980
8 201676
9 201271
10 200767
11 201964
12 201160
13 201255
14 201252
15 201351
16 201539
17 202137
18 201730
19 200827
20
Being Together in Place: Indigenous Coexistence in a More Than Human World
201726

About Jay T. Johnson

Jay T. Johnson is a scholar working on Health, Geography, Planning and Development, General Health Professions, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (10 papers), Indigenous Studies and Ecology (9 papers), Indigenous and Place-Based Education (5 papers), Mining and Resource Management (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (4 papers), Geographic Information Systems Studies (3 papers) and Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (390 citations), Health (414 citations), General Health Professions (494 citations), Anthropology (213 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (194 citations). Jay T. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Richard Howitt, Soren C. Larsen, Brad Coombes, Renee Pualani Louis, Joseph P. Brewer, Kyle Powys Whyte, Gregory Cajete, Andrew D Kliskey, Fikret Berkes and Steven M. Alexander. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability Science, Progress in Human Geography, Geographical Research, Nature Sustainability and American Indian Culture and Research Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact