Jay Mechling

927 citations
50 papers · 491 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Mechling

42 papers receiving 333 citations

Peers

Jay Mechling
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Literature and Literary Theory 96
  • Gender Studies 75
  • Geography, Planning and Development 31
  • Philosophy 61
  • Music 17
Replace Stephen A. Tyler with:
Stephen A. Tyler United States
Jan Harold Brunvand United States
Michael Lempert United States
Alison Landsberg United States
Nicholas Ostler United States
Anne Cranny‐Francis Australia
Jack Zipes United Kingdom
Heather Love United States
Mieke Bal
Avital Ronell United States
Jay Mechling relative to Stephen A. Tyler United States Stephen A. Tyler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Stephen A. Tyler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Mechling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Mechling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Mechling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Mechling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Mechling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Mechling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Mechling. The network helps show where Jay Mechling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Jay Mechling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Mechling Line = papers co-authored together Jay Mechling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987115
2 197547
3 199729
4 198923
5 200120
6 199519
7 198318
8 199117
9 200515
10 199114
11 197312
12 198811
13 200810
14 198910
15 19809
16 19889
17 19818
18 19808
19
\"Yes We Can\": Barack Obama's Proverbial Rhetoric
20097
20 20017

About Jay Mechling

Jay Mechling is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Philosophy and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 50 papers that have together received 491 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (7 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (4 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers) and Military history and social perspectives (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (96 citations), Gender Studies (75 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (31 citations), Philosophy (61 citations) and Music (17 citations). Jay Mechling has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian Sutton‐Smith, Simon J. Bronner, Elizabeth Wein, Lynda M. Applegate, David Wilson, Robert Merideth, John Grady, Stuart A. Marks, Barbara Warnick and David Frank. Their work appears in journals such as Western Folklore, Journal of American Folklore, American Quarterly, Quarterly Journal of Speech and Visual Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact