Jay Mechling

927 citations
61 papers · 584 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Mechling

50 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Jay Mechling
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Literature and Literary Theory 111
  • Gender Studies 88
  • Music 21
  • Geography, Planning and Development 34
  • Philosophy 64
Replace Kathleen Woodward with:
Kathleen Woodward United States
Adam Frank Canada
Amelia Jones United States
Jack Zipes United Kingdom
Anthony Wilden
Michael Lempert United States
Lee Haring United States
Gary A. Olson United States
C. Richard King United States
Akira Mizuta Lippit United States
Jay Mechling relative to Kathleen Woodward United States Kathleen Woodward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
Kathleen Woodward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Mechling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Mechling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Mechling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Mechling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Mechling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Mechling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Mechling. The network helps show where Jay Mechling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Jay Mechling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Mechling Line = papers co-authored together Jay Mechling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987141
2 197548
3 199743
4 198924
5 200123
6 199519
7 199118
8 198318
9 200516
10 199114
11 197313
12 198012
13 200812
14 198811
15 198110
16 198910
17
\"Yes We Can\": Barack Obama's Proverbial Rhetoric
20099
18 19939
19 19899
20 19809

About Jay Mechling

Jay Mechling is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Philosophy and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 61 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (7 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (5 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (5 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (4 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (3 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (3 papers) and Race, History, and American Society (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (111 citations), Gender Studies (88 citations), Music (21 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (34 citations) and Philosophy (64 citations). Jay Mechling has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Brian Sutton‐Smith, Elizabeth Wein, Simon J. Bronner, Lynda M. Applegate, Robert Merideth, David Wilson, Stuart A. Marks, John Grady, Sheldon H. White and Gary Alan Fine. Their work appears in journals such as Western Folklore, Journal of American Folklore, Quarterly Journal of Speech, American Quarterly and Visual Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact