Jay Friedenberg

736 citations
36 papers · 453 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jay Friedenberg

33 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Jay Friedenberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 298
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 142
  • Social Psychology 139
  • Sensory Systems 30
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 22
Replace Frans Boselie with:
Frans Boselie Netherlands
Scott D. Lipscomb United States
Manuela M. Marin Austria
Martin Sawey United Kingdom
Caitlin Mullin Canada
Andrea Schankin Germany
Carl Erick Hagmann United States
Clemens Wöllner Germany
Siu-Lan Tan United States
B Knappmeyer Germany
Jay Friedenberg relative to Frans Boselie Netherlands Frans Boselie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Frans Boselie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay Friedenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay Friedenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay Friedenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay Friedenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay Friedenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay Friedenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay Friedenberg. The network helps show where Jay Friedenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Jay Friedenberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay Friedenberg Line = papers co-authored together Jay Friedenberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Cognitive Science: An Introduction to the Study of Mind
2005105
2 199764
3 201635
4 200935
5 200028
6 200226
7 201522
8 201019
9 201217
10 200214
11 200912
12 20129
13 20177
14 20177
15 20086
16 20216
17
Artificial Psychology: The Quest for What It Means to Be Human
20085
18 20105
19 20195
20 20044

About Jay Friedenberg

Jay Friedenberg is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Automotive Engineering and Marketing, having authored 36 papers that have together received 453 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Color perception and design (17 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (16 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (12 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (8 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (2 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (298 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (142 citations), Social Psychology (139 citations), Sensory Systems (30 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (22 citations). Jay Friedenberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marco Bertamini, Michael Kubovy, Daniel J. Graham, Daniel N. Rockmore, David J. Field and Barry S. Kendler. Their work appears in journals such as Acta Psychologica, Empirical Studies of the Arts, Psychological Research, Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts and Journal of Vision.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact