Jason D. Dapper
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments 4
-
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 3
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- David John Calkins (3 shared papers)Samuel D. Crish (2 shared papers)Keiko Wakui (1 shared paper)Christine J. Shaw (1 shared paper)Leah I. Elizondo (1 shared paper)Iok‐Hou Pang (1 shared paper)Lisa G. Shaffer (1 shared paper)Paweł Stankiewicz (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Mammalian Genome (1 paper)Neuro-Oncology (1 paper)Nature Genetics (1 paper)Neuroscience (1 paper)Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jason D. Dapper
14 papers receiving 800 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Ophthalmology 94
- Cancer Research 150
- Genetics 85
- Neurology 96
- Genetics 165
Countries citing papers authored by Jason D. Dapper
This map shows the geographic impact of Jason D. Dapper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason D. Dapper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason D. Dapper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jason D. Dapper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason D. Dapper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason D. Dapper. The network helps show where Jason D. Dapper may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jason D. Dapper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 231 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 150 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 122 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 59 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 33 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 14 | p38 MAPK Activation in Rodent Retina with Glaucoma-Relevant Stressors | 2012 | 1 |
About Jason D. Dapper
Jason D. Dapper is a scholar working on Neurology, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 810 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (4 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (2 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (94 citations), Cancer Research (150 citations), Genetics (85 citations), Neurology (96 citations) and Genetics (165 citations). Jason D. Dapper has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David John Calkins, Samuel D. Crish, Keiko Wakui, Christine J. Shaw, Leah I. Elizondo, Iok‐Hou Pang, Lisa G. Shaffer, Paweł Stankiewicz, James R. Lupski and Marjorie A. Withers. Their work appears in journals such as Mammalian Genome, Neuro-Oncology, Nature Genetics, Neuroscience and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.