Janet E. Burge

1.4k citations
55 papers · 764 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Janet E. Burge

47 papers receiving 701 citations

Peers

Janet E. Burge
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Computer Science Applications 194
  • Media Technology 143
  • Information Systems 349
  • Software 36
  • Education 272
Replace Iván García with:
Iván García Mexico
Kiev Gama Brazil
Mihaela Sabin United States
Carla Pacheco Mexico
Michael Goldweber United States
Venky Shankararaman Singapore
Maíra Marques Samary Chile
Iván M. Jorrí­n Abellán Spain
Camilo Vieira United States
James E. Tomayko United States
Janet E. Burge relative to Iván García Mexico Iván García's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Iván García · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Burge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Burge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Burge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Burge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Burge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Burge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Burge. The network helps show where Janet E. Burge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Burge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Burge Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Burge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008280
2 200863
3 201055
4 200755
5 200823
6 201322
7 201619
8
Software Engineering Using design RATionale
200518
9 201317
10 201115
11 200813
12 201013
13 201412
14 201211
15 20069
16 20139
17 20148
18 20208
19 20098
20 20098

About Janet E. Burge

Janet E. Burge is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Computer Networks and Communications and Education, having authored 55 papers that have together received 764 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (29 papers), Software Engineering Research (24 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (18 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (8 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (6 papers), Design Education and Practice (4 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (4 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (194 citations), Media Technology (143 citations), Information Systems (349 citations), Software (36 citations) and Education (272 citations). Janet E. Burge has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Gerald C. Gannod, Michael T. Helmick, David C. Brown, Raymond J. McCall, John M. Carroll, Ivan Mistrík, Hans van Vliet, Aldeida Aleti, Antony Tang and Karen Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing, Journal of Systems and Software, Design Studies, Human Technology and International Conference on Software Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact