Janet E. Burge

1.4k citations
67 papers · 1.0k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Janet E. Burge

59 papers receiving 960 citations

Peers

Janet E. Burge
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Computer Science Applications 216
  • Information Systems 499
  • Media Technology 157
  • Software 54
  • Human-Computer Interaction 63
Replace Fadi P. Deek with:
Fadi P. Deek United States
Edmundo Tovar Spain
Iván García Mexico
Kiev Gama Brazil
Stan Kurkovsky United States
Carla Pacheco Mexico
Venky Shankararaman Singapore
Sherlock A. Licorish New Zealand
Iván M. Jorrí­n Abellán Spain
James E. Tomayko United States
Janet E. Burge relative to Fadi P. Deek United States Fadi P. Deek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Fadi P. Deek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Burge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Burge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Burge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Burge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Burge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Burge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Burge. The network helps show where Janet E. Burge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet E. Burge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet E. Burge Line = papers co-authored together Janet E. Burge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008307
2 200894
3 200763
4 201062
5 200058
6 200435
7 200826
8
Software Engineering Using design RATionale
200524
9 201323
10 201621
11 201520
12 200819
13 201318
14 200716
15 201115
16 201015
17 201214
18 201412
19 200611
20 201311

About Janet E. Burge

Janet E. Burge is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Mechanical Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (33 papers), Software Engineering Research (31 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (20 papers), Teaching and Learning Programming (9 papers), Design Education and Practice (8 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (6 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (6 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (216 citations), Information Systems (499 citations), Media Technology (157 citations), Software (54 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (63 citations). Janet E. Burge has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Gerald C. Gannod, Michael T. Helmick, David C. Brown, Raymond J. McCall, John M. Carroll, Ivan Mistrík, Antony Tang, Hans van Vliet, Aldeida Aleti and Karen Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Artificial intelligence for engineering design analysis and manufacturing, Journal of Systems and Software, Design Studies, Human Technology and Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact