Janet D. Wright

12 papers receiving 591 citations

Peers

Janet D. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • General Psychology 41
  • Safety Research 66
  • Plant Science 223
  • Cancer Research 73
  • Cell Biology 81
Replace Arri Eisen with:
Arri Eisen United States
John McLeish Canada
Nicholas P. Edgington United States
Nathan S. Reyna United States
Xiaoxian Liu China
Lenore Neigeborn United States
Sally G. Pasion United States
Jacob D. Kagey United States
Paul Szauter United States
Lisa M. Farmer United States
Janet D. Wright relative to Arri Eisen United States Arri Eisen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
Arri Eisen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet D. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet D. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet D. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet D. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet D. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet D. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet D. Wright. The network helps show where Janet D. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janet D. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet D. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Janet D. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1
Identification of lysine residues required for signal-induced ubiquitination and degradation of I kappa B-alpha in vivo.
1996115
2 2012108
3 199895
4 201777
5 197368
6 201253
7 201343
8 201925
9 202115
10 199812
11 20195
12 20041

About Janet D. Wright

Janet D. Wright is a scholar working on Safety Research, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (5 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (5 papers), Diverse Educational Innovations Studies (2 papers), Career Development and Diversity (2 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper), Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (1 paper) and Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (41 citations), Safety Research (66 citations), Plant Science (223 citations), Cancer Research (73 citations) and Cell Biology (81 citations). Janet D. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Richard A. Wilson, Jessie Fernandez, Laura L. Finken, Janis E. Jacobs, Cristian F. Quispe, Nandakumar Madayiputhiya, James A. Kulik, Donald R. Brown, Françoise Baleux and Fernando Arenzana-Seisdedos. Their work appears in journals such as American Educational Research Journal, Nature Microbiology, New Phytologist, Journal of Biological Chemistry and PLoS Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact