Jane Wright

943 citations
21 papers · 706 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Wright

20 papers receiving 688 citations

Peers

Jane Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 357
  • Aging 27
  • Biochemistry 56
  • Neurology 47
  • Molecular Biology 389
Replace Michiaki Nagasawa with:
Michiaki Nagasawa Japan
Sudarshan C. Upadhya United States
Jean-Charles Liévens France
Takahide Nomura Japan
Ralf Peter Meyer Germany
Rakel López de Maturana Spain
Jens Waak Germany
Carol S. Himes United States
Wen Zhu United States
Jane Wright relative to Michiaki Nagasawa Japan Michiaki Nagasawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Michiaki Nagasawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Wright. The network helps show where Jane Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Wright Line = papers co-authored together Jane Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003186
2 2004133
3 201277
4 200847
5 200944
6 200935
7 201032
8 201323
9 201019
10 201218
11 201517
12 201617
13 201713
14 201313
15 201812
16 20198
17 20154
18 20163
19 19953
20 19751

About Jane Wright

Jane Wright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Aging and Infectious Diseases, having authored 21 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (2 papers), Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (2 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (2 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (1 paper) and Bone and Dental Protein Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (357 citations), Aging (27 citations), Biochemistry (56 citations), Neurology (47 citations) and Molecular Biology (389 citations). Jane Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Randy Blakely, Shawn M. Ferguson, Valentina Savchenko, Mihaela H. Bazalakova, Juan Carlos Tapia, Allan I. Levey, Hong Yi, Craig J. Heilman, Subbu Apparsundaram and Melissa Zwick. Their work appears in journals such as Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, ACS Chemical Neuroscience, BMC Neuroscience, The American Journal of Human Genetics and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact