Jane Wright

26 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Jane Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Microbiology 39
  • Cultural Studies 50
  • Pharmacy 25
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 33
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Charles Wu with:
Charles Wu United States
Rosemary A. Jadack United States
Carol A. Gosselink United States
Francine Lima Gelbcke Brazil
Kathryn M. Taylor Australia
Geoff Debelle United Kingdom
Grace Omoni Kenya
Patrick Okonta Nigeria
Julio Jiménez Puerto Rico
Denice Stewart United States
Jane Wright relative to Charles Wu United States Charles Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Charles Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Wright. The network helps show where Jane Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jane Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Wright Line = papers co-authored together Jane Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996107
2 197653
3 199552
4
Peer review: inter-reviewer agreement during evaluation of research grant applications.
197739
5
Community and Public Health Nursing
201321
6 199621
7 199819
8 202112
9 201810
10 201810
11 20188
12 20054
13
Promoting the Health of School Age Children
20084
14 20233
15 20112
16 20162
17 19952
18 19992
19
Interpreting Section 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998 ? towards an indigeneous jurisprudence of human rights
20091
20
'The important symbols of nursing have not been eradicated--they have changed'.
20081

About Jane Wright

Jane Wright is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Law and Clinical Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Government, Law, and Information Management (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers), Minority Rights and Languages (2 papers), Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (2 papers) and Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (39 citations), Cultural Studies (50 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (33 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). Jane Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include J D Oriel, P. Reeve, Michelle Honey, William M. Webb, Norman Gootman, Jessica Cohen, David Sines, Sheldon Leader, Rebecca Johnson and Karen Roberts. Their work appears in journals such as Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Human Rights Quarterly and Contemporary Nurse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact