Jane Worlding

761 citations
16 papers · 469 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Worlding

15 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers

Jane Worlding
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 143
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 162
  • Gastroenterology 22
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 12
  • Oncology 47
Replace Vicki Porter-Fink with:
Vicki Porter-Fink United States
Pak Shan Leung United States
Marco Tinivella Italy
Yücel Arıtaş Türkiye
Stemmermann Gn United States
Lucy S. Jun United States
F. Samuel van Nierop Netherlands
Carmen Valbuena Portugal
Ph. JAEGER Switzerland
Tzu‐Rong Peng Taiwan
Jane Worlding relative to Vicki Porter-Fink United States Vicki Porter-Fink's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×31×
Vicki Porter-Fink · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Worlding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Worlding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Worlding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Worlding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Worlding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Worlding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Worlding. The network helps show where Jane Worlding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Worlding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Worlding Line = papers co-authored together Jane Worlding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1986115
2 202371
3 198853
4 202442
5 202235
6 202131
7 202427
8
Addition of nintedanib or placebo to neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NEOBLADE) : a double-blind, randomised, phase 2 trial
202221
9 201719
10 198818
11 202415
12
Octreotide in chemotherapy induced diarrhoea in colorectal cancer: a review article.
20099
13 20077
14 20255
15 20261
16 20160

About Jane Worlding

Jane Worlding is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Surgery and Gastroenterology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 469 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (4 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Food composition and properties (2 papers), Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity (1 paper), Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (1 paper), Nausea and vomiting management (1 paper), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (143 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (162 citations), Gastroenterology (22 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (12 citations) and Oncology (47 citations). Jane Worlding has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas W. Read, I. Welch, Nicola Jane Brown, R.D.E. Rumsey, Ian Storie, Christopher George Mathew, Arthur Sun Myint, William Richard Cross, Simon Gollins and Simon J. Crabb. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, The Lancet Oncology, British Journal Of Nutrition, Annals of Oncology and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact